Continuous improvement in the field incident investigation is crucial in the ever-evolving landscape of Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) roles. In this article, we will explore the 'Imperfect Investigator Profiles', highlighting common behaviours that could hinder the quest for comprehensive root cause analysis. Our goal is not only to help you identify these shortcomings but also to guide you towards fostering a proactive safety culture within your team.

The Imperfect Investigator Profiles

1. Cursory Colin: Rushing Through Investigations

Personality Traits:

Busy, time-constrained, pragmatic, results-oriented.

Behaviour:

Colin often rushes through investigations, neglecting to allocate sufficient time for analysis and risking overlooking critical details.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Prioritise investigations proactively to prevent future incidents.
  • Create a structured schedule, including dedicated time for in-depth analysis.
  • Recognise that investing time now can save time and resources in the long run by preventing recurring incidents.

2. Wrong-reason Wray: Overcoming Bias in Investigations

Personality Traits:

Biased, opinionated.

Behaviour:

Wray approaches investigations with preconceived conclusions, seeking to validate his beliefs.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Embrace a mindset of objectivity and curiosity during investigations.
  • Seek diverse opinions and perspectives to challenge existing beliefs.
  • Focus on uncovering the truth rather than trying to confirm preconceived notions.

3. Lone Linda: Collaboration for Well-rounded Insights

Personality Traits:

Independent, self-reliant, introverted, task-oriented.

Behaviour:

Linda conducts investigations in isolation, missing valuable input and insights from colleagues.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Recognise the benefits of collaboration in generating well-rounded insights.
  • Involve team members in the investigation process, seeking their expertise and opinions.
  • Share findings and encourage feedback to improve the quality of investigations.

4. Micro Martin: Balancing Detail and Clarity in Reports

Personality Traits:

Detail-oriented, perfectionist, analytical, risk-averse.

Behaviour:

Martin overanalyses incidents, resulting in overly detailed reports that may miss the bigger picture.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Define clear objectives for investigations to maintain focus.
  • Strike a balance between attention to detail and the need for concise reporting.
  • Always keep the broader context in mind when analysing incidents.

5. Maverick Mike: Embracing Standardised Procedures

Personality Traits:

Independent, non-conformist, innovative, confident.

Behaviour:

Mike strays from established investigation processes, either due to personal preference or misunderstanding.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Embrace the value of standardised procedures for consistency and reliability.
  • Seek clarification when unsure about established methods.
  • Use creativity to enhance rather than replace existing processes.

6.  Infrequent Ingrid: Staying Current in the Field

Personality Traits:

Forgetful, non-committal, resistant to change, procrastinator.

Behaviour:

Ingrid rarely utilises updated investigation tools and features, leading to knowledge gaps and inefficiencies.

Tips for Improvement:

  • Commit to regular training and self-improvement to stay current in the field.
  • Set reminders for updates and changes in tools and procedures.
  • Embrace change as an opportunity for growth and enhanced effectiveness.

Educational Tools for Growth

The Imperfect Investigator Profiles are not critiques but stepping stones toward continuous improvement. By understanding and acknowledging these tendencies, we can start paving the way for growth. This educational tool serves as a mirror, reflecting behaviours that, if left unchecked, could hinder our quest for comprehensive root cause analysis.

Proactive Identification for Continuous Improvement

Identifying these 'imperfect' investigator behaviours is not about pointing fingers; it's about fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Recognising these profiles within our organisation is a proactive step towards:

  • Strengthening Analytical Skills: By addressing rushing, bias, isolation, overanalysis, deviation, and neglect, we sharpen our analytical prowess.
  • Encouraging Collaboration and Diverse Perspectives: Breaking free from isolation and embracing collaboration ensures a wealth of diverse perspectives, enriching our investigations.
  • Striking a Balance Between Detail and Clarity: Detail is crucial, but striking a balance ensures our reports are not bogged down with unnecessary minutiae.
  • Upholding Established Best Practices: Embracing standardised procedures and adhering to best practices ensures consistency and reliability in our investigations.
  • Staying Updated with the Latest Tools and Features: In a rapidly evolving field, staying abreast of tools and features ensures our team remains at the forefront of incident investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, reflecting on what these insights mean for our approach to incident investigations is important. Rather than seeing them as weaknesses, consider these profiles as guideposts pointing us towards growth.

This isn't about achieving an unattainable perfection. It's about recognising the evolving nature of our work and the lessons embedded in these imperfections. Embrace these profiles as markers of a learning journey, where each investigation is an opportunity to refine our skills. Tools like COMET Resilience empower organisations to gain insight into everyday work and enable powerful learning opportunities before harm occurs.

Imperfections are an inherent aspect of any operation, and as such, they should be acknowledged as a natural component of the growth process. By doing so, we can create an environment that fosters a team that is not afraid to learn from their mistakes. Acknowledging imperfections allows us to embrace the learning opportunities that arise from them, and to use them as a means of improving our processes and achieving greater success. Therefore, it is essential that we recognise and accept imperfections as a necessary part of the journey towards excellence.

Learn more about COMET Resilience.